I've often left out the fact that there are musicians and bands that dare not on television to perform live. But today I must revise my opinion possibly because the question is, do not worry, only the relevant program director, that the presence of the artist to the song right picture is down? The question arises because I have seen just five minutes, the repetition of the auto-Ball Championship. No question I need to turn at least for five minutes as the infomercial declared happening, and finally to occur Muse. Their music can like it or not, a certain amount of ingenuity can accuse the band of whatever fan base belong to. Now back to the car crash: During the performance, and to recognize the trained ear in the first few seconds and without looking at the screen as a full backing track, you could hear very briefly and quietly to the public. Apart from the fact that ears can not see: The "applause" of the audience was so quiet that it could be, for the music that came from the TV speakers, but not at "Live". This can be observed even at the non-existent lip-sync. Mir is now but the question: the art, the sound track of the studio recording of the live performance by Muse has set - and the band has played live anyway? If so, why? Matt Bellamy and his devils have no doubt it, to make live music. So is there a clause in the contract performance, which states that is played in stages over a certain size in a playback - because, with the foreign technology does not sound good? One wants to sell records. Make your check mark here and have no one gets - except for the present size of the audience - with, that our technology or your music will not experience the studio needs. Of course not. No live performance sounds like the perfect preserve. can in order to emphasize this (probably been sufficiently resolved) theory, I need someone who sat at the specified time in the stadium and witness, whether the Mus (e) ik which he heard was live or plastic:
only. Please get in touch!
Alors fais comme tu 